International Trade Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

International Trade Law - naming ExampleThe terms were withal accepted by the Surflife smart set and they replied through an email with their expression of ecstasy with the terms. Although there was no exchange of any other terms, the two dispelies could be understood to be in terms of an agreement and involved in a contract. However, the problem had arisen in the economy on part of the PJ Company owing to a mistake occurred by one of the employees of the community who was responsible for the supply of the goods to the customer. The employee, not following the instructions properly, got the wrong orders ready for shipment and supply. The number of jeans supplied was 12,000 instead of 15,000 and another set of orders were also supplied that the buyer club had never requested for. Moreover he proved to be careless in the packing of the goods that suffered damage later in the process. When the goods were finally delivered to the company, it was delayed and the majority of the go ods were destroyed in pelting and ill-treatments of the suppliers. Thus after suffering a huge loss, the company was not willing to pay for the goods to the PJ Company. The principal that arises here deals with the rights and obligations of the PJ Company and how the dissatisfaction of the Surflife Company could be addressed and resolved. ... It can be understood in this expression that the Surflife Company had ordered the pairs of jeans but had not examined the goods before entering into the contract. The contract of the sale of goods in this scene was thus a sale by description. The goods that were delivered to the Surflife Company did not match with the description of the goods stated in the contract by the PJ Company. Hence a violation in the contract could be seen to have occurred and Surflife Company in this scenario had the rights to sue the trafficker company. Being the seller company and one of the parties to the contract where the order was all the way stated along wi th the date of delivery and the size of the order, PJ Company had certain rights and obligations in regard to the delivery of goods to the customer. The seller had the rights to dispose of goods if all conditions are not fulfilled on the part of the buyer or owing to other circumstances (sec 25(1)). The seller company might consider the goods to have been delivered if the buyer expresses credenza or if the goods are retained by the buyer company without giving any further take note (sec 24). Moreover, the seller had the rights to supply the goods only when the buyer demanded for it (sec 35) and such goods may also be supplied in installments (sec 39(1)). The seller may keep hold of the goods till the payment procedure is completed (sec 47(1)) and in the process the company might have hindered the process of shipment or transportation of the goods and regain it after payment is through with(p) (sec 49(2), sec 50). The goods might also be resold by the seller company depending on c ircumstances (sec 54). Also, the company could sue the buyer company if the later showed any breach